The permanent rate of JobSeeker will rise by $25 a week from April. But the $75 a week Coronavirus Supplement to JobSeeker will be abolished at the same time. So people on JobSeeker on 1 April will actually get a $50 per week cut in their payments.
Cutting unemployment benefits in the middle of a recession is likely to cost jobs, rather than create them.
There’s little evidence that retaining the Coronavirus Supplement would hurt employment
There’s little doubt that a very big increase in the long-term unemployment benefit would discourage some people from trying to get a job. But there is little evidence that Australia is approaching that level – even if we kept the Coronavirus Supplement.
After the 1 April ‘rise’, the new permanent rate of JobSeeker will be equivalent to just 41 per cent of the full-time minimum wage. Even if the $75 a week Coronavirus Supplement stayed, the payment would only be about half the full-time minimum wage – hardly a meaningful disincentive to searching for work.
Cutting JobSeeker is likely to cost jobs rather than create them
JobSeeker is one of the best forms of fiscal stimulus there is: unemployed people are likely to spend all or at least most of what they receive. In January this year 80 per cent of people receiving the Coronavirus Supplement said they were spending it on household bills and supplies, including groceries. That’s money in the pockets of Australian businesses, big and small.
Cutting unemployment benefits by $50 a week will take about $5 billion out of the economy in the coming year. That’s likely to push the unemployment rate 0.1-to-0.15 per cent higher than if the current $75 a week supplement were kept. And that means up to 40,000 fewer jobs.
If the Federal Government really wants to get more Australians working, it should think again.